<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Death of SEO</title>
	<link>http://www.webmaster-place.com/blog/2006/11/20/the-death-of-seo.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on The Death of SEO by: Karl Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaster-place.com/blog/2006/11/20/the-death-of-seo.html#comment-504</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webmaster-place.com/blog/2006/11/20/the-death-of-seo.html#comment-504</guid>
					<description>SEO cannot ever be dead:) It is not something too easy, but it is the best method to get traffic to your site.

Since search engine change, even seo tactics need to change. However it is dead if you keep up with what is going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>SEO cannot ever be dead:) It is not something too easy, but it is the best method to get traffic to your site.</p>
	<p>Since search engine change, even seo tactics need to change. However it is dead if you keep up with what is going on.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on The Death of SEO by: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaster-place.com/blog/2006/11/20/the-death-of-seo.html#comment-488</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webmaster-place.com/blog/2006/11/20/the-death-of-seo.html#comment-488</guid>
					<description>Munaz,

Thanks for your comments.  Please leave a link to the article you mention so that we can see more of what you are talking about.

The thrust of my article was that the days of being able to scientifically put a page at the top of a search engine's results for a specific keyword via SEO are over.

You said:

&amp;#62; SEO is not dying because of web 2.0. Instead, it gives 
&amp;#62; a new path for SEO industry as a whole to capitalize 
&amp;#62; the return.

I certainly agree that there are new opportunities for the SEO industry with web 2.0, but those opportunities can not be called &quot;Search Engine Optimization&quot;.  Maybe it should be called W2O, but not SEO.

And I do plan to contact you at your email address for more information. :-)

Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Munaz,</p>
	<p>Thanks for your comments.  Please leave a link to the article you mention so that we can see more of what you are talking about.</p>
	<p>The thrust of my article was that the days of being able to scientifically put a page at the top of a search engine&#8217;s results for a specific keyword via SEO are over.</p>
	<p>You said:</p>
	<p>&gt; SEO is not dying because of web 2.0. Instead, it gives<br />
&gt; a new path for SEO industry as a whole to capitalize<br />
&gt; the return.</p>
	<p>I certainly agree that there are new opportunities for the SEO industry with web 2.0, but those opportunities can not be called &#8220;Search Engine Optimization&#8221;.  Maybe it should be called W2O, but not SEO.</p>
	<p>And I do plan to contact you at your email address for more information. <img src='http://www.webmaster-place.com/blog/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
	<p>Sam
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on The Death of SEO by: Munaz</title>
		<link>http://www.webmaster-place.com/blog/2006/11/20/the-death-of-seo.html#comment-476</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.webmaster-place.com/blog/2006/11/20/the-death-of-seo.html#comment-476</guid>
					<description>I have posted an article on the same which is contrary to yuor argument. SEO is not dying because of web 2.0. Instead, it gives a new path for SEO industry as a whole to capitalize the return. 

What is more important is that the old SEO game doesn't apply the new SEO game in this web 2.0 era. Read the Or Reilly's comparison between web 1.0 and web 2.0 to understand the concept.

Do a study man and then you start writing! If wb 2.0 has given you a platform, think like an intelectual, do research some resarch work and then start posting your argument.

You can contact me at munazanjum@gmail.com if wish to clarify your weak argument that seo is dying.

Regds
Munaz
Bangalore
India</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I have posted an article on the same which is contrary to yuor argument. SEO is not dying because of web 2.0. Instead, it gives a new path for SEO industry as a whole to capitalize the return. </p>
	<p>What is more important is that the old SEO game doesn&#8217;t apply the new SEO game in this web 2.0 era. Read the Or Reilly&#8217;s comparison between web 1.0 and web 2.0 to understand the concept.</p>
	<p>Do a study man and then you start writing! If wb 2.0 has given you a platform, think like an intelectual, do research some resarch work and then start posting your argument.</p>
	<p>You can contact me at <a href="mailto:munazanjum@gmail.com">munazanjum@gmail.com</a> if wish to clarify your weak argument that seo is dying.</p>
	<p>Regds<br />
Munaz<br />
Bangalore<br />
India
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
